The Dvali paper abstract contains “… maximum modulo N …” and inequality mathematics.

Is this in the realm of mathematical game theory?

Compare the Farey sequence [0,1/2,1] to the reciprocal sequence [1,2,oo].

a – Limit theory shows that 0 and oo are reciprocals.

b – 0 is an additive constant in the usual antrhropic numbering system.

c – 1 is a multiplicative constant in the usual antrhropic numbering system.

d – 1/2 is ‘half-way’ between 0 and 1.

Does this allow us to consider oo as a constant and if so what type?

– in the Min-Plus [or Tropical] Algebra sytem, oo [or +oo] is used as the MAX constant.

– in Max-Plus Algebra -oo is used as the MIN constant.

– These algebras are extensions of game theory.

Does this mean that 2 is ‘half-way’ between 1 and oo?

– in a proportional rather than unit number line, indeed 2 is ‘half-way’ between 1 and oo due to reciprocity.

Congratulations on making a rather elite blog roll at ‘MoonshineMath’.

]]>By the way, the last issue of New Scientist contains an article about the discovery that only roughly one half of DNA expresses itself as aminoacid sequences.

A lot of introns, the “junk DNA” are transcribed to RNA. What this RNA might do? Topological quantum computation? As I have suggested for years ago. See the comments at my blog.

]]>